Ethereum Faces Identity Crisis as Buterin Criticizes dApps

• Vitalik Buterin argues that Ethereum’s application layer, not its base infrastructure, needs a moral compass to align with the network’s foundational values.
• He emphasizes that the real ideological influence happens at the application layer, where developers’ philosophies shape what Ethereum apps do for the world.
• Buterin compares Ethereum to C++, suggesting that while its infrastructure may carry ideological influences, the application layer is where values like decentralization shine or fade.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has sparked fresh debate over the soul of Ethereum but not where you might expect. In a recent Warpcast post, Buterin argued that it’s Ethereum’s application layer, not its base infrastructure, that most urgently needs a strong moral compass.

While many in the Ethereum community often focus on the core blockchain infrastructure, also known as Layer 1 Buterin made the case that the real battlefield for Ethereum’s values is on the application layer, where developers build the decentralized applications (dApps) that the world interacts with.

On April 12, Buterin responded to a Warpcast user’s call for a new generation of Ethereum developers rooted in the network’s foundational values. Buterin agreed but with a twist. “It’s the app layer that needs this more,” he emphasized.

He explained that while Ethereum’s base layer is more general-purpose and constrained in what social values it can express, the application layer is where developers’ philosophies have the greatest influence.

“Apps are 80% special purpose,” Buterin wrote. “What apps you build depends heavily on what ideas you have of what Ethereum apps, and Ethereum as a whole, are there to do for the world.”

In short: it’s not just what you build, but why you build it that matters.

Buterin Compares Ethereum to C++ With a Fascist Twist

To illustrate the point, Buterin compared Ethereum to C++, a general-purpose programming language. “Imagine that C++ had been made by a totalitarian racist fascist. Would it be a worse language? Probably not,” he said.

But Ethereum, he argued, is different. While its infrastructure still contains space for ideological influence, like its transition to proof-of-stake (PoS) or commitment to decentralization, the layer where values shine brightest (or darkest) is where users actually interact with the network: the app layer.

“Someone who doesn’t believe in decentralization would not add light clients or good forms of account abstraction,” Buterin said. “Someone who doesn’t mind energy waste would not spend half a decade moving to PoS.”

Still, even Ethereum’s Layer 1 is “perhaps 50% general-purpose,” he noted, suggesting that it is not immune to ideological influence, but it’s far less expressive than the app layer.

Buterin Exposes Ethereum’s Values Divide

In a follow-up post, Buterin provided a list of examples showing what he sees as “good” and “bad” social philosophies in practice.

Apps like Railgun (a privacy protocol), Farcaster (a Web3 social network), Polymarket (a decentralized prediction market), and Signal (a private messaging app) received praise from Buterin for embodying the kind of values Ethereum should support.

“You build apps that do the right thing behind the scenes by default,” he said. “Signal is a reasonably good example of this, though it has significant flaws of its own. Farcaster is also a good example.” But not all platforms get a pat on the back.

Buterin sharply criticized Pump.fun (a memecoin platform), the Terra ecosystem, its now-defunct LUNA token, and collapsed crypto exchange FTX, calling them examples of poor social philosophy.

According to Buterin, these failures weren’t just technical; they were philosophical. “The differences in what the app does stem from differences in beliefs in developers’ heads about what they are here to accomplish,” he said.

Buterin’s comments spotlight a growing divide in the crypto world: builders focused on short-term hype and profit vs. those striving to embed long-term values like privacy, decentralization, and transparency.

In the race to shape Web3, Buterin warns that the real power lies not in protocols, but in the purpose behind the products being built.

As Ethereum matures, the question may no longer be how scalable or secure the platform is but whether the apps running on it serve the public good or simply chase the next meme-fueled gold rush.

Related | SEC Proposes Sandbox for Tokenized Securities to Boost Innovation