- IRS clears path for ETPs to stake digital assets compliantly.
- New guidelines make staking easier for institutional crypto investors.
- Tax clarity boosts staking adoption across proof-of-stake networks.
In a significant development for the cryptocurrency industry, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued guidance to provide a clear regulatory framework for exchange-traded products (ETPs) that involve staking digital assets. This decision represents a refreshing change for institutional investors who seek to participate in staking while also avoiding conflict with federal tax laws.
The news was announced by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who pointed out that the updated guidelines would benefit retail investors, as they would provide ETPs with an easy avenue to invest in digital assets and distribute the corresponding staking rewards.
According to Bessent, the new guidance offers greater benefits to investors, fosters innovation, and helps keep America a leader in the digital asset and blockchain technology fields. This is based on previous pronouncements by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which affirmed that evidence-of-stake undertakings are not securities transactions.
Today @USTreasury and the @IRSnews issued new guidance giving crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs) a clear path to stake digital assets and share staking rewards with their retail investors.
— Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) November 10, 2025
This move increases investor benefits, boosts innovation, and keeps America the…
The IRS answered questions regarding whether activities involving staking may result in changes to the status of trusts as it relates to federal income tax qualification, providing responses based on an 18-page procedural document.
Also Read: Bank of England Launches Consultation on Regulating Sterling Stablecoins and Digital Pound
Key Requirements for Compliance
The new guidelines outline specific requirements for trusts that wish to delegate digital assets to permissionless proof-of-stake networks. Among the main terms is that the trust may only contain one type of digital property and cash. Additionally, it will need to employ a qualified asset manager.
Bill Hughes, senior counsel at ConsenSys, explained that this development is likely to have a profound impact on the adoption of staking within institutional vehicles, such as crypto ETFs and trusts. The safe harbor not only offers the much-needed regulatory and tax certainty but also makes staking a viable and lawful activity within the mainstream institutional framework.
Transforming Staking into a Viable Institutional Activity
As Hughes puts it, this procedural update will practically change staking into what he would call a compliance risk, into an institutionally accepted activity that is tax-compliant. Such a transition will likely increase the adoption rate of proof-of-stake blockchain technology in multiple industries, encouraging additional stakeholder participation in the staking ecosystem.
Under the safe harbor that @SecScottBessent announces below, trusts may stake digital assets (on permissionless proof-of-stake networks) if they:
— Bill Hughes 🦊 (@BillHughesDC) November 10, 2025
1) Hold only one digital asset type and cash;
2) Use a qualified custodian to manage keys and execute staking;
3) Maintain… https://t.co/husxmIpAs6
Having been clarified by the IRS, institutional investors now feel more at ease in incorporating staking into their portfolios without concern for inadvertent but potentially taxable tax complications or regulatory snags.
Cryptocurrency markets. The transparency of staking activities is a significant milestone, indicating that more institutional investors will now consider the staking options of proof-of-stake networks. With the continued mainstream adoption of digital assets, such forms of regulatory improvements are likely critical to the overall adoption of blockchain technology within conventional financial markets.
Also Read: Long-Term Bitcoin Holders Reposition Assets as Market Shifts Toward Stability
How would you rate your experience?