Tuesday, January, 21, 2025

Crypto Innovation Under Threat: BIS Containment Approach Faces Industry Criticism

Crypto
Picture of Anny Sam

Anny Sam

Anny is a skilled crypto writer, delivering clear, engaging content that simplifies complex blockchain concepts for a broad audience.
  • BIS recommendations on isolating crypto pose risks to global finance.
  • Separation of crypto and traditional finance could worsen liquidity crises.
  • Innovation should be embraced, not blocked, to modernize outdated systems.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has published a report analyzing the impact of cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi) on financial stability. The paper recommends stricter controls, urging that public blockchains and DeFi protocols be isolated from traditional financial markets. The authors believe this “containment” approach would reduce systemic risks caused by crypto volatility and instability.

The report recognizes the high rate of growth of the crypto world. It cites the increase of tokenized real-world assets, stablecoins, and the introduction of ETFs based on cryptocurrency. BIS concurs that all these developments are becoming more prominent and more difficult to overlook.

But it cautions that unless tightly controlled, they risk disturbing world markets and undermining the systems of central banking. To guard against that, the BIS puts forward methods to curb the interface between DeFi platforms and the mainstream financial world.

Proposals include integrating regulation directly into smart contracts and imposing tighter capital controls on institutions that transact with cryptoassets. Authorities target stablecoins for their potential to circumvent conventional monetary systems.

Crypto Integration Is a Safer Path Forward

Christopher Perkins, the CEO of one of the top blockchain investment companies, has responded with what he considers to be valid concerns that BIS has been overly blunt.
In his opinion, the concept of containing the crypto is reminiscent of policies of the past to contain ideologies. He thinks that this method misinterprets the nature of blockchain technologies. Perkins believes that crypto, like the internet, cannot be contained and that dividing the financial systems would create an imbalance rather than reduce risk.


Real-time blockchain settlement operates 24/7, while traditional systems still rely on delayed processing, limited to working hours. In a crisis, such as a market crash, this mismatch could trigger liquidity shortfalls on a massive scale.

He underlined the need to modernize the traditional system, not to insulate the new one. If finance failed to embrace this, the traditional one would be more vulnerable to dangers. It should develop links between the two systems, he advised, and implement policies that foster responsible blockchain innovation.

Adapting to Change or Enforcing Control

Essentially, this is the debate regarding how to manage financial evolution. A side promotes isolation to shield the old. A supporting side promotes integration to equip the world for what comes next. BIS aims to contain crypto to mitigate perceived dangers. Professionals in the financial arena counter that doing this would be weakening the overall structure. Decentralization is shaping the future of finance.

Slowing this process could only make matters more unstable. It is up to policymakers to ponder their next move carefully. They can resist or respond. What happens will determine the next ten years of financial life around the world.

Related Reading: Crypto Correction Incoming: Is Bitcoin About to Follow 2024’s Decline? CryptoQuant Weighs In

How would you rate your experience?

Related Posts

Share on Social Media
Scroll to Top