Skip to content
- The SEC is reconsidering XRP’s status, weighing whether it should be classified as a commodity instead of a security.
- Ripple argues that XRP differs from Ethereum, as its ledger was operational before sales began, unlike ETH’s ICO launch.
- SEC’s decision on XRP could reshape crypto regulations and influence future legal battles in the industry.
XRP is facing a critical decision by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that might transform its status from security to commodity. The disclosures from Fox Business reporter Charles Gasparino show the legal matter to be a central aspect in ongoing settlement negotiations between Ripple and the SEC.
Eleanor Terrett Gasparino’s earlier report indicates that the SEC plans to assess if XRP exhibits commodity trade characteristics and utility functions. The SEC analyzes XRP and Ethereum to understand Ethereum’s evolution from ICO status to commodity classification.
Comparing XRP and Ethereum: Key SEC Considerations
Gasparino described the usage of both XRP and Ethereum during the project development funding period. The SEC has implemented varied regulatory methods for these two cryptographic tokens. Ethereum achieved its blockchain development through funds from its ICO, but Ripple encountered legal challenges regarding its comparable fundraising platform.
The SEC established an initial stance that Ether developed into a commodity because its decentralized trading caused this transformation. Former SEC Director William Hinman introduced the stance in his 2018 speech that Ether transitioned from being a security token. The SEC examines whether XRP could qualify as a commodity based on its evaluation considerations.
Ripple’s Argument and XRP’s Unique Position
Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer David Schwartz invalidated the comparison by revealing essential differences between the platforms. According to his claim, Ethereum’s first sale predates the blockchain launch, yet XRP became available only when its ledger was operational.
The crypto community continues to debate the grounds for regulatory consistency after the SEC established this differentiation. Ripple has received accusations indicating unethical treatment by the SEC, while Ethereum reportedly received special favor. This controversy has generated bias accusations that have resulted in the ETHGate name.
Regulatory Implications for the Crypto Market
Ripple benefits from the SEC’s recognition of XRP as a commodity since the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) would assume regulatory oversight responsibilities. The ongoing legal position of the SEC against XRP as a security can cause Ripple to continue receiving future legal challenges.
Future regulatory policies combined with asset classification will change in response to this decision, which will affect the cryptocurrency industry as a whole. All market participants and investors follow the development of this case because the outcome shapes their future choices.
Also Read: Binance Secures $2 Billion Institutional Investment from Abu Dhabi-Based MGX
